Press Release: Preliminary Study of UK Shaken Baby Syndrome cases raises serious concerns

Shaken_Baby_Syndrome2

Press Release: Preliminary Study of UK Shaken Baby Syndrome cases raises serious concerns

Release Date: 10th January 2022
From: Clive Stafford Smith, Founder & Director of 3DC
Contact: info@3dc.org.uk
Subject: Preliminary Study of UK Shaken Baby Syndrome cases raises serious concerns

Download the study report in Word here

Download the study report as .pdf here


“The UK legal system clings on to a false science and condemns those who question it.”   

Today, with the 25th anniversary of the notorious case of Louise Woodward, the nanny convicted of supposedly “shaking” the infant Matthew Eappen to death in Massachussetts in 1997, human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith and the non-profit 3DCentre (3dc.org.uk) releases a ground-breaking study into the UK handling of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) cases.

While the 25th Anniversary of the Louise Woodward case has prompted soul searching among prosecution experts in the US – where the theory behind SBS has been largely repudiated – the same is not true for the UK. There are still roughly 100 SBS cases in Britain each year where parents lose their children and caregivers go to prison. When a lead expert on SBS, Dr Waney Squier, was prompted by evolving science to change her view on SBS, police, judges and the General Medical Council chastised her and she was initially struck off for supposedly overreaching her expertise.

This has sent a chill through the UK medical community and it is now almost impossible to persuade experts to dispute the dubious theory behind SBS.

The 3DC report is a preliminary evaluation of the published SBS cases in the last two decades (preliminary, because the large majority of the SBS cases in criminal and family court are not published). The initial findings are a cause of great concern. The lawyers involved in such cases reflect little expertise: An overwhelming majority of the legal players appear to have little significant expertise in SBS. 69% of the named judges, 86% of the defence barristers and 88% of the prosecution barristers appear in just one case covered by the study. The case decisions suggest strong cultural biases, with all of the identified SBS case judges being white, 82% male, and 88.9% privately educated.

The legal players rely on a small, and seemingly biased, pool of medical witnesses. Just four men appear 81 times in the decisions, representing nearly half (48.5%) of all the cases. There were many possible alternative causes of a child’s injury or death posited in the cases, raising the concern that – as with the US – the medical professionals have reached erroneous conclusions that have in turn made a false conviction inevitable.

“I have been involved in a number of death penalty cases in the US where there has been an allegation that an infant was shaken, and the US is slowly coming to the conclusion that the science doesn’t stack up,” said Clive Stafford Smith, human rights lawyer and director of the 3DCentre. “Unfortunately the UK legal system clings on to a false science and condemns those who question it. It is akin to the Vatican punishing Galileo for insisting that the Sun did not revolve around the Earth.”

“It is shocking so early in my legal career for me to see how misguided the law can be,” said Bristol law student and 3DC apprentice Emily Girvan-Dutton. “But it makes me all the more intent on righting these wrongs.

The case of Louise Woodward (1997)

Louise Woodward was initially convicted of murder, and sentenced to mandatory life in prison, for the tragic death of young Matthew in 1997. The judge reduced the conviction to involuntary manslaughter and she was released for time served. None of the jurors, interviewed after trial, believed she had intended Matthew’s death and the prosecution case rested substantially on medical testimony that the “triad” findings of retinal hemorrhages, subdural hematoma (bleeding on the brain) and cerebral oedema (swelling of the brain) was indicative of violent shaking.

Clive Stafford Smith

Clive is a human rights lawyer best known for his work on behalf of prisoners on death row in the United States and detainees in Guantánamo Bay. Prior to founding the 3DCentre in 2021, he founded other non-profits including the Louisiana Capital Assistance Center in New Orleans that facilitated the careers of scores of justice warriors, as well as the UK human rights charity Reprieve, an organisation that fights for the victims of extreme human rights abuses with legal action and public education. In 2000, Clive was honoured with an OBE for humanitarian services in the legal field. He has represented 87 detainees held in Guantanamo Bay of whom 86 have now been released or cleared, and prevailed all 5 times he has defended the rights of death row and Guantánamo prisoners in the US Supreme Court.

The report details how Clive first took on an SBS case in 1992, when he won a new trial for Sabrina Butler, sentenced to death based on medical evidence, and then ensured her exoneration.

Emily Girvan-Dutton and Astrid Parrett are law students at Bristol and Durham respectively who have worked on the SBS project analysing the cases. They plan to travel to Mississippi to work on the SBS case of Tasha Shelby in Summer 2022.

Links

Website: https://www.3dc.org.uk/

Twitter and Instagram: 3dc_org

Facebook: 3DC.org.uk